Behavior Guidance Often Poorly Cited
A systematic review finds that behavior change communication recommendations are rarely substantiated with clearly linked, relevant citations, raising questions about how clinicians are trained
A systematic review published in BMC Medicine reveals that a majority of behavior change communication guidance for healthcare professionals in general practice lacks robust evidence support. Out of 1,163 recommendations analyzed from 84 sources, only 20% were exclusively backed by relevant evidence. The researchers employed systematic methodologies to assess citation relevance, finding variations based on source type and health behavior categories. Most recommendations on diet and physical activity showed low relevance despite numerous citations. The lack of transparency in citation practices highlights the need for improved training materials that better connect evidence to communication strategies for effective patient interactions.
1. 1,163 recommendations evaluated from 84 guidance sources. 2. Only 20% of recommendations had relevant evidence support. 3. Alcohol use guidance had the highest citation relevance. 4. National guidelines were less likely to provide relevant citations. 5. Systematic reviews were the most cited evidence type. 6. Recommendations lacked clear connections between citations and claims. 7. Transparency in training materials is crucial for effective patient communication. 8. Future studies should assess the methodological quality of cited evidence.