Objective:
To examine the impact of routine AI use in clinical care on physicians' skills and expertise.
Key Findings:
- Include specific statistics from studies, such as the adenoma detection rates (28.4% to 22.4%) and error rates (12% to 15%) for clarity.
Interpretation:
Clarify the potential risks of AI on independent judgment and skill retention, especially in high-pressure situations.
Limitations:
- Discuss the implications of the limited evidence base and the focus outside oncology more thoroughly.
Conclusion:
Emphasize the urgency of embedding AI literacy and regulatory safeguards to preserve clinical expertise.
