Shared Decision-Making Is Institution-Driven
National registry analysis finds institutional factors outweigh patient characteristics
A comprehensive analysis of over 147,000 percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion procedures reveals significant variation in the documentation of shared decision-making (SDM) and the use of patient decision aids (DAs) across different institutions in the U.S. While two-thirds of encounters reflected documented SDM with DAs, findings indicate that institutional factors play a more crucial role than patient demographics in determining these practices. Authors stress the need for institutional investment to standardize and improve the quality of SDM, especially given inconsistencies in real-world application compared to policy requirements.
1. Study analyzed 147,000+ LAAC procedures. 2. 65% of procedures had documented SDM using DAs. 3. Institutional factors drove variability in SDM reporting. 4. Medicare coverage did not enhance SDM documentation odds. 5. Commentary suggests SDM may be compliance-focused rather than patient-centered. 6. Recommendations include improving documentation quality and institutional investment. 7. Higher-risk patients more likely to have documented SDM.