Cenobamate Shows Stronger Real-World Seizure Control
Large retrospective analysis highlights differences in seizure control, retention, and adverse effects among newer agents
A pooled analysis from the CREW study evaluated the effectiveness of cenobamate compared to brivaracetam, lacosamide, and perampanel in patients aged 16 and older with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. The study, encompassing nearly 2,000 patients across 71 epilepsy centers, revealed that cenobamate significantly increased the odds of achieving a 50% reduction in seizure frequency at both 6 and 12 months. Despite a higher rate of adverse effects, cenobamate maintained long-term retention rates, indicating its effectiveness in a challenging patient population. The findings highlight the need for further real-world studies to guide treatment choices in epilepsy.
1. CREW study compared cenobamate with brivaracetam, lacosamide, and perampanel. 2. Cenobamate showed significantly higher seizure response rates at 6 and 12 months. 3. Adverse effects included somnolence and dizziness, but retention was high. 4. Lacosamide had the best tolerability profile. 5. Study results help inform empirical treatment choices for drug-resistant epilepsy. 6. Further prospective studies are recommended for clearer treatment guidance.