FURL vs Mini-PCNL in 2 to 3 cm Stones - Takeaway - MDSpire
From the Journals

FURL vs Mini-PCNL in 2 to 3 cm Stones

Review reports comparable stone-free rates with suction-assisted ureteroscopy

Share

  • 1

    FURL and mini-PCNL have similar stone-free rates for 2-3 cm stones.

  • 2

    Immediate SFR: 84% (FURL) vs. 85% (mini-PCNL).

  • 3

    Suction technology enhances FURL effectiveness.

  • 4

    FURL is associated with lower postoperative pain and shorter hospital stays.

  • 5

    Treatment must be individualized based on patient and stone factors.

  • 6

    Further trials are needed to evaluate FURL for larger stones.

  • 7

    Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy not recommended for stones larger than 2 cm.

Original Source(s)

FURL vs Mini-PCNL in 2 to 3 cm Stones

  • by Kathryn Wighton

  • April 17, 2026

Related Content

ACP Updates Breast Cancer Screening Guidance

Biennial mammography recommended for ages 50 to 74 years, with shared decision-making outside that range.

AI Scribes Lag Clinicians on Note Quality

A VHA study across 11 vendors finds AI-generated primary care notes score lower than clinician-written notes, with the largest deficits in thoroughness, organization, and usefulness

Incretin Trials Often Exceed Muscle-Loss Benchmarks

Systematic review finds muscle-related losses frequently surpass expected thresholds during weight loss, though clinical impact remains unclear