From the Journals
AI Scribes: Efficiency for Whom?
-
By
January 27, 2026
-
3 min
-
1
AI scribes are used to automate clinical documentation.
-
2
Ethical and regulatory issues are prevalent with AI implementation.
-
3
Inaccuracies in generated notes can compromise patient safety.
-
4
Concerns include bias, privacy, and over-generated details.
-
5
Call for regulatory oversight and standardized evaluation for AI scribes.
-
The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence scribes in US healthcare systems aims to alleviate documentation burdens, yet their implementation raises significant ethical, clinical, and regulatory concerns. Authors led by Ursula M. Francis, JD, PhD, MSc, emphasize the need for regulatory approval and post-deployment quality checks to ensure safety and efficacy. AI scribes can generate inaccurate notes, risking misrepresentation of patient information and undermining trust. Concerns with bias, privacy, and overcapture highlight the need for robust oversight and standardized evaluation metrics to improve these tools and align them with healthcare goals.
-
1
AI scribes are used to automate clinical documentation.
-
2
Ethical and regulatory issues are prevalent with AI implementation.
-
3
Inaccuracies in generated notes can compromise patient safety.
-
4
Concerns include bias, privacy, and over-generated details.
-
5
Call for regulatory oversight and standardized evaluation for AI scribes.
Listen Tab content
