Dissection Repair: Does Setting Matter?
-
By
January 13, 2026
-
4 min
-
1
Study covers outcomes of 26,000 type A aortic dissection repairs in the US.
-
2
Similar mortality and complication rates at safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals.
-
3
27% of patients were treated at safety-net facilities.
-
4
Timeliness of intervention is crucial; delays increase mortality.
-
5
Surgeon expertise is key to patient outcomes.
-
6
Future studies needed to explore long-term outcomes from safety-net hospitals.
-
A recent study published in Surgery that analyzed nearly 26,000 cases of Stanford type A aortic dissection repairs in the US found that outcomes such as mortality, complications, length of stay, and costs were similar at safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. Researchers from UCLA, led by Peyman Benharash, MD, highlighted that timely intervention is crucial, as mortality rates increase with delays. The analysis suggests that select safety-net hospitals can effectively manage these complex cases, indicating their potential role as regional providers despite resource constraints.
-
1
Study covers outcomes of 26,000 type A aortic dissection repairs in the US.
-
2
Similar mortality and complication rates at safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals.
-
3
27% of patients were treated at safety-net facilities.
-
4
Timeliness of intervention is crucial; delays increase mortality.
-
5
Surgeon expertise is key to patient outcomes.
-
6
Future studies needed to explore long-term outcomes from safety-net hospitals.
Listen Tab content
